Questão Comentada · 42
1º Semestre · B3GE™
TEXTO DE APOIO (clique para abrir / fechar)
(Note: Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya is the leader of the Belarusian opposition and head of the United Transitional Cabinet. She is currently living in exile in Lithuania.)
Belarus – nestled between the European Union, Ukraine, and Russia – has long been overlooked [esquecido, ignorado, despercebido] and underestimated by outsiders, who often see it as little more than an extension of Russia. This perception stems [resulta] largely from the grip [mão forte] of the country’s dictator, Alexander Lukashenko. Since 1994, he has transformed Belarus into a repressive state marked by fraudulent elections, systemic violence, and a deepening reliance on Moscow and Beijing.
But five years ago, Belarusians made it clear that they do not want to live in a belligerent autocracy, isolated from the rest of Europe and the rest of the world. In 2020, I entered Belarus’s presidential election to stop Lukashenko from claiming a sixth term [mandato]. I didn’t expect to win; Lukashenko had rigged [fraudado] every previous contest. But my message – free the country’s political prisoners, end repression, hold real elections, and restore the rule of law [estado de direito] – struck a nerve. According to independent observers, Belarusians overwhelmingly voted for me. When Lukashenko declared himself the winner anyway, the country exploded in the largest peaceful uprising [revolta pacífica] in its modern history. Up to 1.5 million people flooded the streets of Belarusian cities demanding change.
I did not intend to enter politics. I was an English teacher and then a full-time mother focused on helping my hearing-impaired son [filho com deficiência auditiva]. My husband, Siarhei Tsikhanouski, was the political one – an entrepreneur whose blog exposed the daily humiliations of life under dictatorship. His words inspired thousands. When he announced his candidacy in May 2020, the regime arrested him days later. I decided to run in his place – not out of ambition, but out of love.
The response to the protests was brutal. To clear the streets, the regime carried out waves of mass arrests, engaged in widespread torture, and generally terrorized the populace. It detained tens of thousands of people, and it beat hundreds more. I was forced into exile, along with many others. But still, the uprising shook the regime to its core. The demonstrations might have succeeded, if not for Russian President Vladimir Putin. To prepare for his February 2022 invasion of Ukraine, Putin needed Belarus as a launching pad. He thus propped up Lukashenko by sending security advisers and other kinds of operatives, providing financial assistance, and signaling a readiness to intervene more intensely – saving Lukashenko’s rule in return for obedience and Belarus’s subjugation. Today, my country remains under de facto Russian occupation. Nine million people are being held hostage by a regime that answers not to them, but to the Kremlin.
QUESTÃO
According to the information in the article, Alexander Lukashenko’s response to the presidential election protests most likely resulted in which of the following?:
The Belarusian government released Siarhei Tsikhanouski from prison but exiled him to Lithuania.
Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya will never be allowed to return to Belarus.
Many protestors were murdered and their bodies were never recovered.
The Belarusian people have lost the will to fight against the dictatorship.
Russia now controls the Belarusian government.
🔐 Gabarito (clique para revelar)
🧭 Leitura orientada
A questão solicita identificar a consequência mais plausível da reação do regime de Alexander Lukashenko aos protestos populares que se seguiram à eleição presidencial de 2020.
🔍 Identificação das informações-chave
O texto descreve que a repressão violenta não foi suficiente para derrubar o regime porque Vladimir Putin interveio, oferecendo apoio político, financeiro e operacional a Lukashenko. Em troca, Belarus tornou-se subordinada aos interesses do Kremlin, sendo hoje descrita como estando sob ocupação russa de fato.
🧠 Núcleo de sentido
A resposta de Lukashenko aos protestos, somada ao apoio decisivo da Rússia, resultou na perda efetiva da autonomia política da Bielorrússia, que passou a responder prioritariamente aos interesses russos, e não à vontade popular.
🔍 Análise alternativa por alternativa (com pegadinhas)
(A) ❌ Errada
Pegadinha: o texto afirma que Siarhei Tsikhanouski
permaneceu preso; quem foi forçada ao exílio
foi Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya.
(B) ❌ Errada
Pegadinha: embora esteja exilada,
o texto não afirma que Sviatlana
jamais poderá retornar ao país.
(C) ❌ Errada
Pegadinha: o texto menciona violência,
tortura e prisões em massa,
mas não assassinatos sistemáticos
com ocultação de corpos.
(D) ❌ Errada
Pegadinha: o texto deixa claro que,
apesar da repressão,
a população não perdeu a vontade de lutar;
o movimento só foi contido
por interferência externa.
(E) ✅ Correta — GABARITO
A alternativa resume o desfecho apresentado no texto:
com o apoio decisivo de Putin,
a Rússia passou a controlar,
na prática, o governo da Bielorrússia,
mantendo Lukashenko no poder
em troca de submissão política.
🧠 Resumo B3GE™ Master
✔ Repressão interna não bastou.
✔ Intervenção russa foi decisiva.
✔ Belarus perdeu autonomia política.
🔎 Gabarito confirmado: (E)